Very
few stories have left me with burning questions and thoughts bouncing through
my head like Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms. I would recommend this story to anyone interested
in easily one of the best romance stories around. Even after I put the book down I still had to
process the ending alone in silence for a good thirty minutes because of the
culmination of so many elements that Hemingway built up throughout the
book. With great tense moments, and
fantastic descriptions of mundane moments that would otherwise be dull, Hemingway
created a beautiful book that anyone who appreciates a good story will fall in
love with.
With
a story as deep as Hemingway’s, I found myself quite close to falling into some
bad-reader traps, simply because I could not put the book down. As time progressed, I would have to do temporary
reality checks to stop myself from identifying with Henry, or recount the
events that just occurred. Reading too
much in one sitting was definitely one of my shortcomings as a reader, at least
at first, partially because I had not developed good habits for remembering
details. To cure this, I used post-it
notes to mark key details which helped me sustain my addiction. I tried my best to clear my mind before every
new chapter, but I found that I enjoyed some sections, like the retreat and the
final hospital scene more when I read through them altogether at once. The mental strains of reading for a longer
time helped me better process the stressful atmosphere of the story. In summary, while I made some mistakes as a
reader at the outset of the story, I corrected a lot of my poor habits by the
end.
As
I mentioned in previous posts, Hemingway’s use of rain and weather in general
is a phenomenal symbol that helps amplify the tension, sadness, or in some
cases bluntness, of any event. Rain is
used throughout the story at some many various times, but some particularly varying
mentions of rain are during the couple’s entrance to Switzerland as Catherine
says “They never had rain like this in Italy.
It’s cheerful rain” (278), as well as the use of rain during Henry’s
escape from the Italian soldiers. The variation
in the weather itself is not different in the slightest, but the contributions
to the tone and mood could not be more different. Hemingway’s ability to use such a simple
environmental feature as a versatile tool is a legendary ability. In one context, rain reflects the equality between
Henry and the men who serve under him, while in another it shows the
cleanliness of starting a new life in a new country with Henry’s wife. Ultimately, I really enjoyed the use of
weather throughout the story, because not only does it enhance the imagery of
the situation, but the contribution to the emotions of the scenes is fantastic.
Love
is something absolutely quintessential to this story, and Hemingway has a lot
to say about it. The ending of the story
is the culmination of so many emotions and ironies in simple short sentences
that define love in an absolutely beautiful way. Hemingway shows that love is pure, rich and
comprised of service, while detailing the vulnerability, and infectious spirit
of it at the same time. Henry’s history
of lustful relationships yield no emotional gain, but the ironic nature of
Henry staying alive at the front and escaping death to love, only to lose his only
love in perfect safety is profound and oddly beautiful. In the final lines of the story, Hemingway
writes “It was like saying good-by to a statue…I went out and left the hospital
and walked back to the hotel in the rain” (332). This is the ultimate destination of Henry’s
character: being ruined by tragedy with every tribulation overcome and every
trial complete. But Hemingway doesn't hesitate
to reveal the joys of love, as he describes the relationship between Catherine
and Henry beautifully throughout the text, even describing their love in the
quiet Swiss home as a practically magical experience. Hemingway’s description of the connection
between the two characters is perfectly tragic and pure at the same time. There is no grand finale of goodbyes and
kisses and promises, there is calm conversation and death, followed by simple
the simple act of entering a room and losing a connection. Hemingway’s story defines love in all aspects;
as we see the strong connection emerge from lust, endure under duress, blossom
in reunion, and die, in absence.
Have you ever seen Midnight in Paris? I know it's a silly Woody Allen movie, but Hemingway appears quite a great deal and based on the way you've described his writing style, it seems like Woody nailed it. Also it's just fun and full of rad artists from Hemingway's time period. Anyway, there's a movie recommendation for you.
ReplyDeleteOf what we read over the summer, Thomas Foster spends a lot of time and energy talking about weather and symbolism. Could there possibly be some sort of baptism? I know snow isn't quite rain but they both fall into the same family of precipitation and are at base just falling water.
From your description of the relationship between Henry and Catherine, it seems kind of unhealthy to me. I know that Hemingway is often thought of as being a very macho author, and this shines through when I heard about this "romantic relationship". Based on the quote you included in your second post, it seems like Catherine feels like she needs Henry to complete her. She discards any of her own aspirations and says she only wants what Henry wants. Now that's codependence if I've ever seen it. Get it together, girl!
Going along with Hemingway's machismo, it doesn't seem as though Henry is a very emotionally open person or that his emotions are very accessible. Could it be that the rain that occurs during important moments of his life serve as emotion for him? As little kids, we always describe rain as "god crying", but maybe in this case it's Henry crying. Or at least showing some strong emotion. Just something to think about.
May I just say, Patrick, that I believe that you have done an outstanding job of not only relaying the essence of the text to your blog readers, but you have intrigued me with some of your insight. I can feel Hemingway's masterpiece coursing through my veins.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I have never really read anything by Hemingway (or remembered any of it if I have),reading your comments gave me a good sense of what this dude is all about. You sort of act like a secondary source for me . In addition to giving me a taste of Hemingway's "machismo" as Leah might put it, you gave a good recommendation that will not mislead readers.
As you focused a lot on the weather of the piece, I noticed that I did something similar in my blog posts. The author of my book, Daniel Defoe, focused a lot on the weather to establish setting and mood as well. In a way our books sound eerily similar. Both men out on their own struggling with their surroundings and their internal being as well.
You explain that you fall into a lot of bad-reader traps. Me, being a bad reader, would love to hear more explanation as to how you found yourself in those traps and how you managed to get yourself out. Something along those lines would cause more reader involvement and connection as well as force them to question their reading techniques. Who knows, it might even make their work better. Overall great work Patrick, stay golden.
Jack Blanchard :)
I have always wanted to read Hemingway, I have heard so much about it in the past. After reading your blog posts, it is really encouraging me that it was such powerful and deep red to you. It makes me even more drawn to A Farewell to Arms. Your blog posts were very well written and humanized. I think that you did a very good job of conveying your analysis of the text and giving many direct examples to draw us into the story.
ReplyDeleteThe love story aspect that you presented in your second post was very interesting. Henry seems to be in love in his speech but not in his actions or heart. In always replying that he loves Catherine but never serving or sacrificing any part of himself for her he is showing that by the priest’s definition, he does not love Catherine. I was with you in wondering how a relationship like this could work. What would cause Catherine to stay with someone who she knows does not care about her. Is her dependence on Henry due to loss of so many soldiers in the past, or due to some other past experience? Why does Henry feel the need to lie to Catherine day day in and out? Reading this post made me want to read this book myself so I could find out what happens.
I like how in your final post, you revealed your mistakes in falling into “bad-reader traps”. This is definitely one of the best steps towards fixing these mistakes and becoming a better reader. Often times people will not acknowledge their mistakes at all, and I think that especially in a somewhat unknown territory of AP Lit, its very important to realize what we've done wrong.